![]() |
|||||||||
|
Thursday, Nov. 30, 2006
|
|||||||||
In This Issue |
NBFAA NewsSave the Date for the 2007 Spring Conference and Golf Tournament NBFAA will hold the annual Spring Conference in Las Vegas in conjunction with the ISC West Expo, March 28 – 30. The conference begins on Sunday, March 25, 2007 and runs through Thursday, March 29. The fourth annual Alarm Industry Research and Educational Foundation (AIREF)/NBFAA Golf Tournament will be held Tuesday, March 27. All proceeds benefit AIREF. Prior years’ proceeds helped fund the industry’s first comprehensive study of verified response. The results of the study can be found at NBFAA’s Web site at www.alarm.org. Check NBFAA’s Web site often for conference updates. Online registration will be available next week. NBFAA Participates in GAO StudyThe NBFAA was recently contacted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) for assistance in a study being conducted to determine how federal protective service could better measure the performance of its control centers.
Alarm History 101: Where There’s Smoke…Editor’s Note: The Alarm Industry has an illustrious and interesting history going back more than 100 years. Many do not know the history of the industry that they have chosen as a profession. Because of this we have decided to include a brief look in Member Update at some of the events that have shaped the alarm industry into what it has become today. Alarm History 101 provides information on the path the industry has taken and of the ideas that have impacted it. If you have questions about our industry’s history you would like answered send an e-mail to communications@alarm.org. While American inventors upgraded burglary protection, Europeans improved the art of fire detection with the ionization smoke detector. The technology was invented in Nazi Germany to protect munitions plants in the late 1930s. Thereafter, Swiss scientists working for the firm Cerberus refined the German model. In the mid-1950s, Cerberus began marketing smoke detectors in America through the company Pyrene, which was owned by Baker Industries. The ionization detector was a major improvement in fire protection technique, which is best understood in view of the four stages of a fire:
Ionization detectors were designed to sense the tiny particles released in the incipient stage. Photoelectric sensors were activated by smoke, and heat sensors, even the rate-of-rise units were not activated until the third or fourth stages. The advantage of the ionization detector was its ability to sense entities common to all fires in their early stages: charged particles. The Europeans designed a system that exploited the electrical properties of ions. In a small chamber they created an electrical current using radioactive radium. The radium emitted energy that charged the air molecules and created a steady current through the chamber. Ions produced by a fire would enter the chamber and cause resistance in the closed circuit, triggering an alarm. Early problems centered on the poser source. The detector needed 220 volts of direct current to operate, which made it costly and vulnerable. The high power demand required that it be tied to the electrical system. If a fire destroyed the electrical system first, the alarm would be dead before it could sound. American inventors made important contributions that made the detector suitable for mass use. In 1964 Denver Burglar Alarm founded fire alert to refine and manufacture the ionization detector. Fire alert’s Don Stroh developed a detector that required only 24 volts of alternating current to operate. With innovation and mass production, suppliers were able to market the best protection value ever conceived: a reliable and effective detector that retailed for less than $25. Intense competition drove down the prices for some units to $10. Consumers could install the sensors themselves in less than 10 minutes and maintain them by replacing the battery annually and dusting the interior. Consumers recognized a good value and began snatching them up at a dizzying pace – urged on by fire-fighting officials who believed that the detectors should be in every structure in America. In the early 1970s the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development mandated fire detection systems in a variety of new buildings constructed with federal funds, including hospitals and nursing homes. Property standards issued thereafter required fire protection in most new and old buildings using government money. The endorsements and regulations fueled the boom in smoke and ion detector sales: from 500,000 units in 1973 to 2.9 million in 1976 – a 600 percent increase in for years. A series of major hotel fires gave the market for protection services another boost. A fire at the MGM Grand Hotel in Las Vegas on Nov. 21, 1980, killed 84 persons. The flames destroyed the amplifiers on a manual fire alarm system before it could be activated. Only the first three floors of the 26-story building had sprinklers, and most of them failed to operate. This arrangement defies common sense since the first three floors are the only ones accessible to a fire department ladder. The upper floors are the most hazardous in a fire. In addition, the hotel had no smoke detectors. Fire department officials were still analyzing the wreckage of the MGM fire when a flash fire killed 26 guests in the conference rooms at Stouffer’s Inn in White Plains, New York, on Dec. 4. This hotel had sprinklers in all the guest rooms, but local fire codes did not require the conference rooms to be so protected and they weren’t. Yet another fire killed eight and injured 300 guests of the Las Vegas Hilton on Feb. 10, 1981. The wing of the hotel where the fire burned did not have sprinklers, which were not required by the code. The fire was attributed to arson. In an ironic twist, a fire broke out at the Caesar’s Palace in Las Vegas on the final day of NBFAA’s convention there on April 1, 1981. Unlike the others, this blaze was contained and extinguished within 30 minutes. The tower where the fire broke out had no sprinklers, but it did have detectors, which worked. These fires prompted a widespread upgrading of fire codes for all kinds of structures. By the mid-1980s, most businesses protected their premises with some type of fire-detection equipment, according to a survey of 1,500 readers of Security World magazine. And history repeated itself as fire protection was upgraded in the wake of major tragedy. Source: A History of Alarm Security Copyrighted by NBFAA 1979, 1980, and 1991. Enjoy FAIM TodaySign up for a Fire Alarm Installation Method (FAIM) course in your area today and receive world class training of the latest fire alarm services today. This two-day course is ideal for individuals seeking to expand their knowledge of the installation, service and maintenance of fire alarm systems. Additionally, this course provides the necessary review material to prepare for NICET Level 1 and 2 examinations. This course follows the structure of NFPA 72 and is based on the 1996 edition of NFPA 72 and NFPA 70. This course will end with the administration of a two-hour, multiple-choice examination. Attendees successfully completing the examination will receive a certificate of course completion.
Advanced Burglar Alarm Technician Certified Alarm Technician (Level 1) Fire Alarm Installation Methods Continuing Education Courses NBFAA & Chapter Calendar HighlightsDecember Packed with Events
Member NewsSDi Product Line Now Available From The Systems DepotThe Systems Depot is excited to offer SDi’s complete line of fire detector testing equipment and service equipment. SDi detector testing equipment has been specifically designed for all fire alarm technicians to save both time and money.
TRUTEST is a field service test instrument for sensitivity testing of smoke detectors. TRUTEST is a fully portable device, enabling fire alarm technicians to measure the actual sensitivity of smoke detectors quickly and easily in one test, displayed in a percent-per-square-foot format. CHEKKIT® SMOKE aerosol and the CELLCHECKER™ pulse load battery tester are the latest products from SDi. CHEKKIT® SMOKE is a hand-held functional tester of both ionization and photoelectric detectors while CELLCHECKER™ determines a battery's remaining power capacity by measuring its ability to maintain voltage while under load. For more information on SDi products, visit SDi online at www.sdifire.com or call The Systems Depot today at (877) 797-3376. Member Benefit Spotlight
Industry News You Can UseBack-Up Arrives For Fight Against False DispatchesReinforcements have arrived for the battle against false dispatches. Last month the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) passed a resolution urging municipalities and counties to require the Security Industry Association (SIA) CP-01 standard for all alarm control panels. The resolution calls for panel manufacturers to comply with the standard in producing all new panels as well. “The CP-01 standard has proven to be successful in reducing false dispatches. Now we just need to get more people to adopt it,” said Stan Martin, executive director of the Security Industry Alarm Coalition (SIAC). “Support from the IACP shows this is not just an alarm industry initiative. Both the alarm and law enforcement industries want to reduce false dispatches and we know this is one of the best ways to do it.”
The SIA CP-01 standard sets higher design requirements for alarm control panels. Its goal is to reduce alarms caused by equipment failure as well as user error. Under the new provisions, control panels must cover event recognition, information handling sequences, as well as provisions for system layout testing. In addition, installers must use specific program options and test procedures to ensure compliance. “Underwriter Laboratories has tested burglar alarm control panels and found that most manufacturers have at least one product in compliance with the new standard,” said Martin. “Dealers should use this newer equipment. In addition to proper user training, it's the best long-term solution to reducing user error." For a copy of the resolution or to learn more about CP-01 standards, log onto www.SIACinc.org. The Legal Side: The N.J. Case - A Problem for the Alarm Industry?
|